In an interesting study, the University of Michigan's Paul Thagard makes an elegant argument by proposing thorough criteria for separating science from pseudoscience, showing that astrology falls into the latter category. For him, astrology should not be considered a pseudoscientific failure, because Gauquelin did not find a correlation between different astrological signs and any career, Gemini did not show the expected correlation between the same sign as Gemini, studies did not show a correlation between the importance of planets discovered in Ptolemy's time, and major disasters can wipe out people with different signs at the same time.
On the one hand, horoscopes and astrological predictions seem a bit harmless entertainment to most people. However, some people consider these predictions to be scientifically credible and regard astrology as a valid method of understanding human behavior. There is concern that citizens are making important life decisions based on unreliable astrological predictions.
Not all studies are the same, but if you look at the literature, you come across some studies that at least seem to suggest that astrology can work. Scientific studies have never found evidence for the claims of astrologers that lead people to believe that astrology is scientific. About 20 years ago, Ivan Kelly of the University of Saskatchewan returned to this study and explained where the theoretical foundations of astrology lie.
The researchers designed their study in close collaboration with the Indiana Federation of Astrologers. A meta-analysis was performed on a pool of 40 studies consisting of 700 astrologers and 1,000 natal charts. A young physicist named Shawn Carlson was careful to design an unusual study, and he made sure it met the demands of the scientific and astrological community.
Astrology differs from astronomy, the scientific study of celestial objects in space, and the physics of the universe. Specific aspects of astrology, such as predicting a person's future or advising on daily activities such as horoscopes, are becoming increasingly popular. But no matter how popular the way we look at our individual personalities and characters, astrology as we know it is being pushed aside and replaced by older techniques that look at real events that are actually happening.
For centuries, astrology - in search of signs based on the movement of celestial bodies - was considered the same as astronomy, the scientific study of these bodies. For example, the 17th-century revolutionary astronomer Johannes Kepler, who was studying the movement of planets at the time, was considered an astrologer. At the beginning of the enlightenment in the late 17th century - the point where astronomy became known as science - astrology was not recognized as a science.
Astrology is based on scientific calculations of constellations and planetary movements. Astrology was based on understanding the position of the stars, which in itself seems scientific enough. However, because it was based on theories and traditions developed by astrologers over the centuries, astrology was considered something to study. Sources:
Astrology is defined as the belief that astronomical phenomena such as the stars where one is born and the fact that Mercury is retrograde have the power to influence the daily events of our lives and personality traits. The position of different celestial bodies (planets, moons, asteroids) at the time of our birth reflects a deeper truth of who we are and what happens to us, claim astrologers. Astrology is based on the study of planets and mercury patterns that occur over hundreds of years.
It is difficult to find new studies on astrology because they have been so thoroughly refuted that there is little incentive to conduct additional studies. Damned as science and vilified by much of society, you might think astrological predictions are just fluffy chatter that won't help you navigate the years. Astrology refers to the study of the movement and position of stars, moons, and planets and how they impact events for people on earth.
There are two different forms of confirmation bias in studies relating to astrological beliefs. A whole series of studies dealing with certain event projections, zodiac signs, compatibility with their professional inclinations or the ability of astrologers to align the astrology profile of a person can lead to devastating results for the credibility of the professions. The stated levels of belief are due to the confusion between astrology and astronomy, the scientific study of celestial objects.
Boxer argues that astrology as we know it today - the column that predicts what your zodiac sign will have for you over the next few weeks - was an invention of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Like the quantum data scientists of their time, like all of us, the astronomers were enthusiastic about the promise of numerical data to unlock our own secrets and our world, without acknowledging that others might follow along the way. Although astrology has been debunked for reasons that I assume have nothing to do with our destiny as it is written in the stars, it stops, aided by countless trashy magazines and newspapers, and even more serious ones, in order to feed our own vanity, absorbed in itself.
The American data scientist Alexander Boxer, who holds a Ph.D.
in physics, explains that belief in the astral influence of celestial bodies on people on Earth in ancient times led to a careful study of the night sky. Historian Nick Campion notes that Solar Astrology was domesticated in the universe around the time astronomy discovered that our galaxy was only a tiny point among billions in an ever-expanding universe. The Internet of Things has changed all that, Boxer says, with websites and apps that allow personalized astrological predictions based on personal data - much more boutique, bespoke astrology than in the past.